Book Review
Ethnicity and Nation-building in South Asia- Urmila Phadnis
& Rajat Ganguly.
Synopsis:
The
book was first published in 1989, this widely hailed core text of the dynamics
of ethnic identities and movements in the South Asian region is perhaps even
more relevant today, as the region faces a resurgence of ethno-nationalist
sentiments and the outbreak of new ethnic conflict.
We are going to
discuss about the Ethnicity and Nation-building: Approaches and Issues, Ethnic
Groups in South Asia: An Overview, South Asian States Systems: Diverse
Patterns, Similar Tendencies Central Leadership, and Ethnicity: Perspectives,
Policies and Strategies, Ethnic Movements: Dynamics of Demand-Divergence Ethnic
Dynamics of Autonomist and Secessionist Demands Ethnic Separatism: External
Dimensions, Implication and Conclusion.
'This is probably
the only work that deals with the entire spectrum of South Asian ethnicity and
its dynamic role in regional politics. A decade and a half later after the
first edition were published, the work has become even more relevant because
ethnic divisions have become sharper all across the region. This updated second
edition is thus welcome by Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan, Contemporary South
Asia.
Key Words:
Ethnicity, Ethnic groups, Leadership, One party dominance model, Panchayat
system, Asian states, and policies & Strategies.
Objective:
Major
features of this thoroughly revised edition are
1.
It provides a critical appraisal of
various theoretical approaches to the study of ethnicity and nation-building
2.
Delineates the ethnic composition of
the South Asian
3.
Region- examines the specific state
structures of the countries studied: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka,
Nepal, Bhutan and the Maldives.
4.
Discusses various ethnic movements in
these countries - covers the most recent developments in the region.
About
the Author:
Urmila
Phadnis: She was born on 1931 and died at the age 90. She
was an International Affairs Professor in JNU. She wrote many books such as
Religion and politics in Sri Lanka, Ethnicity and Nation-building in South
Asia, Domestic Conflicts in South Asia: Economic and ethnic dimension, Towards
the integration of Indian states- 1919 to 1947, and Maldives, wind of change in
an atoll state.
She
along with her graduate students worked on the, study political system in South
Asia in 1970s. During the course, on the theme of challenges to national
integration in South Asia, they put forward daunting questions which made her
feel time and again that she needed to reflect more closely on the
ramifications of this subject. In 1979, the award of a Senior Fellowship by the
Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) provided her with the
opportunity to pursue the study of ethnicity and nation building in South Asia.
Dr
Rajat Ganguly: Is based in the
School of Management and Governance at Murdoch University, Perth, Western
Australia. A specialist in international relations, conflict and security
studies and Asian politics and international affairs, he has published widely
in the areas of ethnic conflict, insurgency movements and Asian politics and security.
His published books and monographs are: Autonomy and Ethnic Conflict in South
and South-East Asia (Routledge 2012); Understanding Ethnic Conflict (Longman
1998, 2002, 2006, 2010); Ethnic Conflict (Sage 2009); Ethnic Conflict and
Secessionism in South and Southeast Asia (Sage 2003); Ethnicity and
Nation-Building in South Asia (Sage 2001); and Kin State Intervention in Ethnic
Conflicts (Sage 1998).
About
the Book
The
book, Ethnicity and Nation- building in South Asia by Urmila Phadnis has
totally seven chapters, preface to the first edition, Introduction,
Endnotes, and Index keyword.
Each
chapter has an Introduction part, five sub topic and a conclusion.
Chapter
1: Ethnicity and Nation-building: Approaches and Issues.
The
chapter focused much about, the how the ethnic nationalism has been manifested
in different form in developed countries like America and Europe. Many of these
countries has witnessed the rise of anti-immigrants and right nationalist
sentiments in recent years which in turn have provoked minority immigrant
communities to politically mobilise themselves in order to protect and promote
their political, economic and socio-cultural rights.
Ethnicity
and ethnic identity have therefore been crucial variables in the formation,
re-formation and consolidation of state structure in south Asia. The partition
of colonial India into two states of India and Pakistan had its apparent
legitimation in the ethnic distinctiveness of the two nations furthermore, the
emergence of Bangladesh in 1917 based on the separate ethnic identity with a
Muslim Pakistan signified a rare case of successful ethno secessionist movement
during the cold war period. Ethnic
groups can be divided into homelands societies and diaspora communities.
Chapter
2: Ethnic Groups in South Asia: An Overview
The
majority of the population fall within three large linguistic groups:
Indo-Aryan, Dravidian and Iranic. The Indian, Nepalese and Sri Lankan societies
are traditionally divided into castes or clans, which are based primarily on
labour divisions; these categories have had no official status in India since
independence in 1947, except for the scheduled castes and tribes, which remain
registered for the purpose of affirmative action. In today's India, the
population is categorised in terms of the 1,652 mother tongues spoken. These
groups are also further subdivided into numerous sub-groups, castes and tribes.
The
traditions of different ethnic groups in South Asia have diverged, influenced
by external cultures, especially in the north western parts of South Asia and
also in the border regions and busy ports, where there are greater levels of
contact with external cultures. There are also genetically isolated groups who
have not been genetically influenced by other groups, such as the Jarawa people
of the Andaman Islands. The largest ethno-linguistic group in South Asia are
the Indo-Aryans, numbering around 1 billion, and the largest sub-group are the
native speakers of Hindi languages, numbering more than 470 million.
Chapter
3: South Asian States System: Diverse Patterns, Similar Tendencies.
The
nature of the structure in south Asian states, with various types of regimes,
reflects historical, socio-economic and cultural content as well as the context
of their civil societies. An appraisal of the similarities as well as
specificities of the south Asian system necessitates a probe into the
· historical antecedents of
the formation of contemporary south Asian states
· socioeconomic objective
and goals as well as policy options and choice of the state elite
· the evolution of the
constitutional frame work of the state system
· strategies of alliance
pattern and the web of linkage between and among the various segments of the
power elite resulting at times in regime changes.
Chapter 4: Central
Leadership and Ethnicity: Perspectives, Policies and Strategies.
It’s easy to generalize
about Asia economies are growing rapidly, nationalities vary widely, distances
are long. April
1971, the Indian armed forces began to prepare for swift military action,
though in utmost secrecy, in case a peaceful solution of the refugee problem
could not be found. Moreover, the operation had to be swift and finished before
the big powers succeeded in halting the conflict and imposing a ceasefire.
India's campaign received
a very positive response from the media, the intelligentsia and the students in
the West and ultimately from the West European governments besides the people
and the governments of the Soviet Union and other European Communist countries.
But the governments of the United States and China adopted an unsympathetic and
even hostile attitude towards India. Ignoring Indian protest, the US continued
to supply arms to Pakistan. It also tried to pose the problem of Bangladesh
primarily as an issue between India and Pakistan rather than one of
Bangladesh's independences. China was fully supportive of Pakistan as it had
become virtually its ally.
Chapter 5: Ethnic
Movement: Dynamic of Demand- Divergence
The
phenomenon of ethnicity is an intrinsic component of the socio-political
realities of multi-ethnic states in South Asia as well as in other parts of the
world. Today, ethnicisation of politics and politicisation of ethnic
communities have become very common and have diffused mutual tolerance, and
have thus sharpened ethnic consciousness among various communities. At this
juncture, the processes of socio-economic change, the ethnic dimensions of the
power structure, and the policies, strategies as well as tactics adopted by
various governments in response to the urges and aspirations of different
ethnic groups provide a ground for a clear understanding of ethnicity, ethnic
conflict and their dimensions.
The concept
of ethnicity has also become a critical variable in the formation and
reformation of states. Some scholars have argued that even the partition of
colonial India into the two new states of India and Pakistan had its roots in
the ethnic distinctiveness of the two nations. India and Sri Lanka have largely
been on the amplification of racial conflict. There has been no uniform pattern
in the upsurge or the tension of the racial conflicts. They have, nonetheless,
shown heightening of the conflagration from time to time. India has been a case
of composite culture, while Sri Lanka has not been into that frame.
There have been
several peace accords signed during these years. The Peace Accord in Assam in
1985, and the Bodo Accord, 1983, have taken care of the problem of the east.
Although the north-east simmers with socio-political problems, it appears that
the major problem of Assam regarding the issue of erstwhile Bangladeshis has
been put to rest. It is essential to note that in such cases the problem is
more social than political and vice-versa at the same time. This intermeshing
of ethnic issues with politics as well as regional considerations has been
commanding attention.
Chapter 6: Ethnic Dynamics
of Autonomist and secessionist demand.
South-East Asia is one of
the most complex regions in the world as far as ethnic, linguistic and cultural
diversity is concerned with an extremely rich ancient and contemporary history.
Because of this, it offers an exceptionally rich field of study for
inter-ethnic relations. This book examines interethnic relationships between
groups and the dynamics of exchange networks throughout Asia and includes case
studies based in Vietnam, Burma, Laos, Nepal, China, and Siberia.
The innovative aspect of
this book lies in the fact that the contributors examine relationships between
groups and the dynamics of exchange networks across Asia rather than ethnic
groups studied in isolation. Rendering the important moments of daily life of
ethnic groups and focussing on the exchanges between groups sharing a specific
social space, this approach, today still rarely used in Asian anthropology,
allows systems of exchange to emerge and for us to understand the systems of
power and local leadership from the inside out.
Chapter 7: Ethnic
Separatism: External Dimension
Separatism is the advocacy
of cultural, ethnic, tribal, religious, racial, governmental or gender
separation from the larger group. Separatist groups practice a form of identity
politics, or political activity and theorizing founded in the shared
experiences of the group’s members.
Separatism can include
autonomism and secessionism, despite the fact that independence is the primary
goal of many separatist movements. Many separatist movements arise as a result
of religious, racial, social, and cultural disparities between certain peoples
and the majority or ruling class in a country. What constitutes an autonomist
or secessionist movement is often debatable; entries on this list must be
recognized by credible sources as involved, separatist, and composed of
citizens of the country from which independence is sought.
The 1971 Bangladesh War
for Independence broke the idea that Islam alone was enough to unite South
Asia’s Muslims. India never saw a successful separatist movement, and one
reason for that may have been India’s decision to redraw India’s states along
ethno-linguistic lines and allow them to conduct business in their own official
language. If India had pushed Hindi across the board like Pakistan did with
Urdu in East Pakistan (Bangladesh) India might have seen its own violent
secessionist uprisings.
Language analysis: The book contains an
abstract which will give most of the ideas about the content inside. Additionally,
there are keywords for easy understanding of the topic. Each chapter is divided
into 3 parts Introduction, sub topics and conclusion which make reading and
understanding of the content easier. She
used regular language so its very easy to draw the idea what she wants to
convey. This book provides in-depth study of the south Asia in terms of
ethnicity and nation – building. It is a standardized book.
Implication: The book India after
Independence by Bipan Chandra, Mridula Mukherjee and Aditya Mukherjee explained
about the Politics in the States (I): Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Assam in
Chapter 22. Under the topic Foreign Policy Initiatives, they have explained
about the LTTE, and neighboring countries policies and strategies.
This book provided an
intense information about the relation between India and other neighboring countries in terms of policies, alliances, and ethnicity. It also gave a depth
knowledge about the south Asia culture, south Asian state system in different
dimension.
Conclusion:
The book provided an
understanding about a critical appraisal of various theoretical approaches to
the study of ethnicity and nation-building, Delineates the ethnic composition
of the South Asian, Nationalism and the nation-state are Western concepts, made
global following the age of colonization and then made standard during the 20th
century. Though the idea of belonging to a country with a unified identity
seems almost inherent today it’s an extremely radical idea.
For most of human history
people only identified with their personal networks (extended family,
community, caste, tribe etc.). The Western notion of an ethnically homogenous
nation-state with a shared culture and unified identity did not exist and made
little sense in a world of extreme diversity.
As centuries went on
homogenous ethnic regions with a shared language and identity formed. The issue
with this is following the end of colonialism many non-Western nations adopted
the idea of the homogenous nation-state despite being very diverse. Western
cultural diversity was destroyed over the course of centuries to make way for
nationalism, the non-West thought they could do it immediately. This is what
transformed countries like Lebanon (once a stable, wealthy, and diverse region
for thousands of years) into a powder keg of conflict. It’s also what inspired
bizarre ideas like trying to make Urdu the official language of East Pakistan
(Bangladesh) with zero status for Bengali.
Comments
Post a Comment